Proof beats adjectives.
“World-class” is easy to type. Useful evidence takes a little more effort.
Show something a buyer can examine
A relevant example, a clear explanation of the work and an identifiable source of a testimonial are more useful starting points than a row of unsubstantiated superlatives. Your proof should relate to what the customer is choosing you to do.
When a project is your own demonstration, say so. When a redesign is a proposal rather than commissioned work, say that too. These are still legitimate ways to show your thinking. They simply prove different things.
Own-brand concept.
Real design work. No imaginary client.
Separate appearance from outcomes
A before/after image can show a change in layout, readability, content hierarchy or visual style. It cannot, by itself, establish an increase in sales. That requires appropriate outcome data, a time period and an honest account of other changes that could have influenced the result.
Avoid attaching a percentage because it makes the layout look finished. Empty evidence does not become stronger in a very handsome font.
Use permission and context
Before publishing client work, confirm your right to show it and the accuracy of any attribution. Do not imply that a business approved a speculative concept. Remove private information and be careful with screenshots that contain names, orders or account details.
This lesson is a publishing checklist, not a complete legal review. Australian misleading-claims guidance is a relevant starting point; rights and contractual obligations depend on the material and circumstances.
A practical checklist
- Label concept work next to the example, not only in a distant footer.
- Connect any results claim to evidence, dates and limitations.
- Confirm rights and remove personal or confidential information.
A little judgement call.
Read the explanation
The second describes what is actually available to inspect. The first adds commercial results the image cannot establish.
A learning exercise, not an expertise score. No answers are sent anywhere.
Evidence & perspective
Truthful-presentation house rules informed by Australian regulator guidance. This is not legal advice.
ACCC: false or misleading claims ↗Learning edition · 17 September 2026 · DigiThat. Recheck live standards and documentation for your project.